dharshini hello. this is bbc news with martine croxall. we'll be taking a look at tomorrow morning's papers in a moment — first the headlines. donald trump has renewed his attack on the author of a new book, who suggested that the president's closest advisors question his fitness for office. mr trump called the journalist, michael wolff, "a fraud". i consider it a work of fiction and i think it's a disgrace that somebody‘s able to have something, do something like that. the libel laws are very weak in this country. if they were strong it would be very helpful. you wouldn't have things like that happen, where you can say whatever comes to your head. an ambulance service has apologised to the family of an elderly woman who died after almost a four hour wait for paramedics. a spokesperson for the department of health said it was a ‘tragic case‘ and ‘completely unacceptable‘. reports from syria say 17 civilians have been killed in air raids on the rebel—held enclave of eastern ghouta, near damascus. today‘s attacks come as aid workers say hospitals have been directly targeted. house of fraser has confirmed that it has asked landlords

to reduce rents on some of its shops. the department store chain is due to reveal its christmas trading figures next week. and highlights of click‘s recent live show, have to stay safe online. hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with this eve pollard, commentator. and also dharshini. the sunday times claims that the prime minister will hold a cabinet reshuffle on monday with up to ——

macro with several minutes of being moved or sacks. the sunday telegraph says thatjustin greaney is fighting for thejob. old media posts were held to contain disgusting tweets. the sunday express right that theresa may has ordered a review into pa role theresa may has ordered a review into parole board after the former taxi driverjohn warboys, found guilty of sexual assault against several women has been released. let‘s look into the stories about the reshuffle which will happen next week although downing street has been circumspect about whether they have got any of the names right.

some senior ministers looking safe, according to this report? yes, boris‘s name does not come up. but others do not. shuffling a whole six—pack. mrs me is either busy being furious about stories or reshuffling. —— mrs theresa may. education, an area that has seen problems over the last couple of yea rs problems over the last couple of years because of funding changes. on the other hand, you have gotjeremy hunt in charge of another crisis in department. it looks like he could be moving upwards to replace damian green. so lots going on there. we could see a whole raft of new faces. the idea is to make way for the new generation. butjustin greening has been popular with the unions, they

say the she has understood them all. but britain is not near the top of any list in the education thing. reading, maths, they are not great at school. i'm afraid this is what happens. you go into a job and have to turn it around really fast or you are out. there is a feeling that you are out. there is a feeling that you are left with a lot of people here who don't have kids or whatever people are saying, i go to school every day and everyone to know, want to shout about what is going wrong with my school. the younger cabinet, a more diverse cabinet would be more interesting. justin greening was educated in a comprehensive. the first education secretary who had not been to a public school. and the idea was that she would understand more about social mobility and what

that looks like and people who had done thejob before. that looks like and people who had done the job before. and to be fair to her, she has been dealt a hard hand because there have been changes infunding hand because there have been changes in funding particularly in inner—city schools. that is problematic. how can you deliver better results when you are wondering if you can keep the number of teachers you have now? at the same time, something in the sunday times, saying that theresa may might adopt her patronising tone, whatever that means? hard to know. which politician is not patronising at? you have a whole load of new politicians who are fairly untouched by some of the drama is that i've gone before, give them a go and revitalise the whole thing. gone before, give them a go and revitalise the whole thingm gone before, give them a go and revitalise the whole thing. it needs a new look. you need experience as well? she‘s leaving quite a lot in

place. the sunday telegraph highlights justin greening, saying she is fighting for herjob. but she hasn‘t got a huge amount of room for manoeuvre? very little. and a minority government. and she has very little time because mr michel barnier is have —— has had christmas with his family and is coming back to brexit. she has to do all this as well as brexit. downing street has said that all of the speculation in the sunday papers is just speculation. they are saying it is all guesswork but we are expecting a reshuffle all guesswork but we are expecting a res huffle o n all guesswork but we are expecting a reshuffle on monday and tuesday. there has to be, because there is a va ca ncy there has to be, because there is a vacancy created by damian green moving on. you have to get that in place. there have been a lot of complaints from civil servants and other parts of the non—brexit

policies that brexit has taken over. maybe brexit has to? it is the most scary thing we are doing. and you will work the —— you are working with europe with europe who have never done before. the daily mail, pm's never done before. the daily mail, pm‘s discussed at sordid tweets. toby young has got a position on the new office for students watchdog. it shows how social media can haunt you for years. it is the advice given to university students, be careful about what you write, it could come and haunt you. it appears that the new appointee had not paid attention to that. he has deleted many

thousand tweets. some of which we we re thousand tweets. some of which we were told one misogynistic or offensive. have you read some of them? yes. of course, when social media was started, nobody would think they would come back and hit you. i have to say that i know two byung poong. it was interesting when we talked about education and he has done interesting things with three schools. but you cannot have somebody who has written stuff about women, which he has, going into these semi—governmental positions. the truth is, the only worrying thing is that you grow a group of people who are dull, boring. the whole thing about social media is that i think we will look back at it and say gosh, we used it stupidly at the beginning. some of these tweets go back to 2009. people managed to

ta ke go back to 2009. people managed to take a screenshot of them. they will never go. you can't get rid of them. it draws comparison with other cases. the person from sheffield who did a treat us found to be not the best person to be on the qualities committee. and isn‘t it hypocrisy to keep toby young? if it's not part of the whole harvey weinstein thing about the attitude to women? there is no suggestion that there is anything of that nature. of course not. if easy to explain it away as something you made a mistake on nine yea rs something you made a mistake on nine years ago, but i think toby will still in his 40s when he wrote those! i don't know if toby has ever answered any of these. .. ? he could use the papers. i think it would be

interesting. something should talk to him about also some other things. he is smart and savvy but how stupid to let all this out on social media. also embarrassing for people who oversaw the process. you should do due diligence if you are hiring someone. due diligence if you are hiring someone. but you probably talk about different things, you don't talk about... what's on the road eight yea rs about... what's on the road eight years ago. the sunday express, pm‘s fury at rate fast. review into parole board —— at rape farce. this had been poured over for the last few days because some victims were not notified that he this was going to happen. many victims were not notified and never included in the court case that sent him down. so there are various things. the indeterminate sentence, which didn't

used to exist but does now. you think when somebody gets an indeterminate sentence, they are going away for a long time. we now discover they are not. on the other thing is, we have seen photographs of his kit. a premeditation seems to be part of it. there is booze, drugs, also of things. and the fact that many women felt that they were not even allowed to actually put their case, not even allowed to actually put theircase, i not even allowed to actually put their case, i can't believe this won't come back to haunt and there will be another case. the idea is being put forward that there should being put forward that there should be more transparency about how pa role be more transparency about how parole board makes decisions. the pa role parole board makes decisions. the parole board makes decisions. the parole board has said that there is not transparency out there. for this to happen is appalling. you think of the 100 other alleged victims who as we we re the 100 other alleged victims who as we were talking about earlier, this is the time now when we could see

them putting their lives back together. the other thing is, it's another thing that is totally transparent about government. how do you get on the parole board? the wizard made up of? is there anybody normal, sensible, practical? is it just full of legal people? it is one of those things that is coated in mystery. how do you get onto the pa role mystery. how do you get onto the parole board. victims are asked for their views of the release but we never quite know how much they figure in the final decision. and also victims in this case were not told at all. the observer, trump, i‘m a very stable genius. bigley. if you have said, you‘re probably not! he is lashing out because of this book. he

does keep stories going by protesting about them. does keep stories going by protesting about themlj does keep stories going by protesting about them. i know the journalists. why was he allowed to hang around the white house. along if they didn't think he was going to produce an article at least if not a book? trump says he has never been interviewed by him, that he wasn‘t given access to the west wing at all? michaelwolff given access to the west wing at all? michael wolff says he has. and dinner parties as well. all of that. one fantastically interesting thing, having been to new york, is it is like donald trump is on the apprentice everyday. there is a new reality show and he is the star. he lost it. he says i went to a very —— from a very successful businessman

to tv star and president on my first try. that would qualify as genius. the fact that he now knows that people are leaking stuff left right and centre in the white house and keynote that he is now saying that michael wolff didn‘t do the interviews and yet he has got so much evidence that he has gathered... you have a turnover of the very senior staff, what to expect? sloppy steve? this is something that every prime minister has to look at when they do a reshuffle. everybody who gets thrown out, they talk to the newspapers the next week. steve bannon has obviously been a influence behind this book. he thinks he created this president and is very angry. i think

that as long as we are talking about him, donald does not mind. and when we have brexit coming up, this is the front page, the president of the united states saying, i am very stable. i said united states saying, i am very stable. isaid he united states saying, i am very stable. i said he is a blip. united states saying, i am very stable. isaid he is a blip. brexit is for ever. we can never get away from trump or brexit! we have proved that again tonight. back again at 11:30pm. coming up next is click. welcome... welcome, how are you? hello... ?